Design @F-L-O-W

Design @F-L-O-W

Introduction using a Teachable Point of View (TPOV)

Designing In Differences

Design @F-L-O-W

Identify what you are wasting now!
Identify what makes you happy.
Identify right consumption.
Identify right levels of success.
Contribute!

The question may be What’s Different?

The design and meta-design system at flow are nuanced to incorporate 7 parameters:

Capability
Bias
Style
Level
Role
Values
System Dynamics

So far, I don’t think there is a lot of difference in what you might find in any design program using a set of design parameters.

But.

Let me show you why Design @F-L-O-W is different.

I want to take you back to our Talking Points:

Blank Slate (@BS) contrasts
@F-L-O-W

We Begin Broken
We Begin Different

Everyone Is Created Equal
Everyone Is NOT Created Equal

To Be Fair, It Must Be The Same
To Be Fair, Each Different, But Fair

To Be Happy, Be Successful
To Be Happy, Be, Do, Have, Become, Contribute

Wants Replace Needs
Needs Replace Wants

Credit Card – Wants
Passbook – Needs

Net Energy Is Decreasing
Net Energy Is Shifting – Transduction

Noise Accumulates as Signal
Signal Filtering Critical

We Can Learn Anything
We Can’t–Should Not–Learn Some Things

Trust until you find a reason not too…
Mistrust until you find a reason not too…

We Can Be Anything We Want
We Can Be Anything We Can & Are!

Because We Can, We Will
Because We Can, Doesn’t Mean We Will

We Are Rational Human Beings
We Are Largely Irrational Beings

Refuse To Accept Ourselves And Others
Unconditionally Accept Ourselves & Others

All Problems Can Be Solved By Growth
Growth Is A Solution To Some Problems

Models and Statistics Can be generalized
Generalization not possible to differences

Development Through Personal Change
Development with Scaffolding

Personal Change Is The Leverage Point
Acceptance Is The Leverage Point

Focus on Self-Awareness
Focus on Self-Knowledge

Values are hierarchical
Values are Networks

Either/Or –> Certainty
Both/And –> Paradoxes

Close the Gap
Keep the GAP Open!

What makes Design different at flow are the basic assumptions of the paradigm which have changed.

Let me grab a particular set of ideas for an example.

In BS, we consider to be equal and capable of Being, Doing, having, becoming, and Contributing ANYTHING.

It’s not the same @F-L-O-W.

We can’t expect people to behave in this way.

What we can expect them to be, do, have, become and contribute are largely influenced from those 7 areas I noted above.

What does this to for and to design?

Almost all of our current designs are built upon the notion of BS, that if you can’t be, do, have, become and contribute anything, then the design has to be focused number one on what you can and will do.

Secondly, because you are unique and different, we can’t keep expecting you to be, do, have, become and contribute what you can’t, so measures of capability, bias, style, level, role, values and system dynamics become really important in producing designs that are efficient, effective, and sustainable.

Third. I would be almost all of the current designs in your life are following this path unconsciously, but consciously you are finding it hard to make all the adjustments you need to being perfect as determined by societies standards…or for you own if you are one of those in the 1-5% who set standards for living at flow.

The four session program I’m going to guide you through will open to your eyes about not only what is possible, but what is probable in your own life and the movement to detach from those design standards that were not meant for living at flow.

BONUS: You will also receive our Living at FLOW course, a $197 value, as it will help you better make use of what you learn in Design @F-L-O-W. Visit https://leadu.net/2013-guidance/livingatflow/ to learn more about Living at FLOW.

More Info @F-L-O-W